The purpose of this study was to compare psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes performance. The statistical population consist of all male karate ka(Young weight(-60,-67,-80 and -55) and Adult weight(-60,-74 and+84) athletes in “Gogoryo” style for selection of Iranian national team(n=85). The Elite population of this study included all the male karate ka that win Gold, Silver and Bronze medals (n=22) and non-Elite group (n=45) consist of another karate ka. South Australian Sport Institute Test (SASI Psych) and lane performance Inventory were used in order to compare subjects' psychological skills. After use of K_S, the results of descriptive statistic, t Test and Pearson coefficients showed significant difference between the two groups in Motivation, concentration, controlling psychological level, imagery and confidence variables (P
Esfahani, N. and Ghezelseflo, H. (2013). The comparison of psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes’ performance. Journal of Psychological Studies, 9(1), 109-120. doi: 10.22051/psy.2013.1739
MLA
Esfahani, N. , and Ghezelseflo, H. . "The comparison of psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes’ performance", Journal of Psychological Studies, 9, 1, 2013, 109-120. doi: 10.22051/psy.2013.1739
HARVARD
Esfahani, N., Ghezelseflo, H. (2013). 'The comparison of psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes’ performance', Journal of Psychological Studies, 9(1), pp. 109-120. doi: 10.22051/psy.2013.1739
CHICAGO
N. Esfahani and H. Ghezelseflo, "The comparison of psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes’ performance," Journal of Psychological Studies, 9 1 (2013): 109-120, doi: 10.22051/psy.2013.1739
VANCOUVER
Esfahani, N., Ghezelseflo, H. The comparison of psychological skills of Elite and non-Elite Karate ka and its relation with athletes’ performance. Journal of Psychological Studies, 2013; 9(1): 109-120. doi: 10.22051/psy.2013.1739
)