The prediction of women vulnerability (family\'s women\'s supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strategies and locus of control
The purpose of present study was to predict
women's vulnerability (family's women's supervisor) against stress based on
ratio of social support and coping strategies with stress and locus of control.
Descriptive- correlation method was used in this direction. 250 women were
selected in Shiraz
city. They were selected with simple randomly method. For collecting data
questionnaires such as Khodayari Fard's stress symptoms, Lazarus and Folkman's
coping strategies, Rutter's locus of control and Duck social support had been
used. Obtained data were analyzed by using multiple regression method in SPSS
software. Obtained results indicated that coping styles variables (escape-
avoidance, meeting and seeking social support) and social support variables
were able to predict the interaction with each other and significant criteria
variable changes separately (vulnerability against stress).
(2012). The prediction of women vulnerability (family\'s women\'s supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strategies and locus of control. Journal of Psychological Studies, 8(1), 117-140. doi: 10.22051/psy.2012.1531
MLA
. "The prediction of women vulnerability (family\'s women\'s supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strategies and locus of control". Journal of Psychological Studies, 8, 1, 2012, 117-140. doi: 10.22051/psy.2012.1531
HARVARD
(2012). 'The prediction of women vulnerability (family\'s women\'s supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strategies and locus of control', Journal of Psychological Studies, 8(1), pp. 117-140. doi: 10.22051/psy.2012.1531
VANCOUVER
The prediction of women vulnerability (family\'s women\'s supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strategies and locus of control. Journal of Psychological Studies, 2012; 8(1): 117-140. doi: 10.22051/psy.2012.1531